Xelians Black Box Program
About Xelians
Xelians, French leader in corporate document management (11,000 customers), capable of supporting them in the management of all of their documentary flows and information assets, physical and digital.
The Xelians group is made up of 3 subsidiaries, Xelians Archivage (specialized in third-party physical and digital archiving), Xelians Digital (specialized in the dematerialization of processes, digitization and integration of EDM solutions) and Maarch (open source software publisher).
About XAM
Xelians Archives Management (XAM) has built its solution around Open Source components: VITAM (a government-led initiative), CAS (an identity federator) and ElasticSearch (a powerful search engine).
Joining an open-source approach provides reassurance to users regarding the sustainability of the solution. Indeed, the dynamism of the community guarantees frequent functional developments, thus protecting the solution from any technological disruption.
In addition, our electronic archiving solution has a native multi-multi-tenant architecture. The data is partitioned between several clients, but also by tenant (safe) within the same client.
About XDH
Xelians Data Hub is a flow concentrator with ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) functionalities specialized in document exchanges.
It allows to collect documents and metadata from multiple sources, and automate the steps involved in transforming and adding them to an electronic archiving system like X-AM (Xelians Archives Management).
Program Rules
Testing Policy, Responsible Disclosure
Please adhere to the following rules while performing research on this program:
- Denial of service (DoS) attacks on Legapass applications, servers, networks or infrastructure are strictly forbidden.
- Avoid tests that could cause degradation or interruption of our services.
- Do not use automated scanners or tools that generate large amount of network traffic
- Do not leak, copy, manipulate, or destroy any user data or files in any of our applications/servers.
- No vulnerability disclosure, full, partial or otherwise, is allowed.
- Make sure to apply hunting requirements policy (User-Agent, VPN...)
Reward Eligibility
We are happy to thank everyone who submits valid reports which help us improve the security of Legapass, however only those that meet the following eligibility requirements may receive a monetary reward:
- You must be the first reporter of a vulnerability.
- The vulnerability must be a qualifying vulnerability (see below).
- The report must contain the following elements:
- Clear textual description of the vulnerability, how it can be exploited, the security impact it has on the application, its users and Legapass, and remediation advice on fixing the vulnerability
- Proof of exploitation: screenshots demonstrating the exploit was performed, and showing the final impact
- Provide complete steps with the necessary information to reproduce the exploit, including (if necessary) code snippets, payloads, commands etc
- You must not break any of the testing policy rules listed above
- You must not be a former or current employee of Legapass or one of its contractors.
Reward amounts are based on:
- Reward grid of the report's scope
- CVSS scoring and actual business impact of the vulnerability upon performing risk analysis
Reward Grid
| Asset value | CVSS Low | CVSS Medium | CVSS High | CVSS Critical |
|---|
| Critical | €50 | €150 | €700 | €1,500 |
Systemic Issues
| Report Number | Reward Percentage |
|---|
| 1st report | 100% |
| 2nd report | 100% |
| 3rd report | 75% |
| 4th report | 50% |
| 5th report | 25% |
| 6+ report | 10% |
Scopes
Out of Scope
- All domains or subdomains not listed in the above list of 'Scopes'
Vulnerability Types
Qualifying Vulnerabilities
- SQL Injection (SQLi)
- Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
- Remote Code Execution (RCE)
- Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR)
- Horizontal and vertical privilege escalation
- Authentication bypass & broken authentication
- Business Logic Errors vulnerability with real security impact
- Local files access and manipulation (LFI, RFI, XXE, SSRF, XSPA)
- Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) with real security impact
- Cross-site Request Forgery (CSRF) with real security impact
- Open Redirect
- Exposed secrets, credentials or sensitive information on an asset under our control and affecting at least one of our scopes
Non-Qualifying Vulnerabilities
- Broken Link/Social media Hijacking
- Tabnabbing
- Missing cookie flags
- Content/Text injections
- Clickjacking/UI redressing
- Denial of Service (DoS) attacks
- Recently disclosed CVEs (less than 30 days sinces patch release)
- CVEs without exploitable vulnerabilities and PoC
- Open ports or services without exploitable vulnerabilities and PoC
- Social engineering of staff or contractors
- Presence of autocomplete attribute on web forms
- Vulnerabilities affecting outdated browsers or platforms
- Self-XSS or XSS that cannot be used to impact other users
- Any hypothetical flaw or best practices without exploitable vulnerabilities and PoC
- SSL/TLS issues (e.g. expired certificates, best practices)
- Unexploitable vulnerabilities (e.g. Self-XSS, XSS or Open Redirect through HTTP headers...)
- Reports with attack scenarios requiring MITM or physical access to victim's device
- Missing security-related HTTP headers which do not lead directly to an exploitable vulnerability and PoC
- Low severity Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) (e.g. Unauthenticated / Logout / Login / Products cart updates...)
- Invalid or missing email security records (e.g. SPF, DKIM, DMARC)
- Session management issues (e.g. lack of expiration, no logout on password change, concurrent sessions)
- Disclosure of information without exploitable vulnerabilities and PoC (e.g. stack traces, path disclosure, directory listings, software versions, IP disclosure, 3rd party secrets, EXIF Metadata, Origin IP)
- CSV injection
- Malicious file upload (e.g. EICAR files, .EXE)
- HTTP Strict Transport Security Header (HSTS)
- Subdomain takeover without a full exploitable vulnerability and PoC or not applicable to the scope
- Blind SSRF without exploitable vulnerabilities and PoC (e.g. DNS & HTTP pingback, Wordpress XMLRPC)
- Lack or bypass of rate-limiting, brute-forcing or captcha issues
- User enumeration (e.g. email, alias, GUID, phone number, common CMS endpoints)
- Weak password policies (e.g. length, complexity, reuse)
- Ability to spam users (email / SMS / direct messages flooding)
- Disclosed or misconfigured public API keys (e.g. Google Maps, Firebase, analytics tools...)
- Password reset token sent via HTTP referer to external services (e.g. analytics / ads platforms)
- Stolen secrets, credentials or information gathered from a third-party asset that we have no control over
- Exposed secrets, credentials or information on an asset under our control that are not applicable to the program's scope
- Pre-account takeover (e.g. account creation via oAuth)
- GraphQL Introspection is enabled
Reports of Leaks and Exposed Credentials
In the context of this program, we do not intend to encourage, accept or reward reports of leaks that are not applicable to our program's scope and policy.
| Scenario | Eligible |
|---|
| Source of leak is in-scope AND Impact is in-scope (e.g. valid credentials on an in-scope asset) | Eligible |
| Source of leak belongs to the Organization and is out-of-scope AND Impact is in-scope | Eligible |
| Source of leak does not belong to the Organization and is out-of-scope AND Impact is in-scope | Not eligible |
| Source of leak is in-scope AND Impact is out-of-scope (e.g. valid credentials for an out-of-scope asset) | Eligible |
| Source of leak belongs to the Organization and is out-of-scope AND Impact is out-of-scope | Not eligible |
| Source of leak does not belong to the Organization and is out-of-scope AND Impact is out-of-scope | Not eligible |
Hunting Requirements
User Agent
Please append to your user-agent header the following value: -BugBounty-xelians-31337
Hunters Collaboration
When submitting new report, you can add up to 5 collaborators, and define the reward split ratio.
For more information, see the help center. Note: For reports that have already been rewarded, it is not possible to redistribute the rewards.