UFarm Digital
Status: Active
Launched: 24 Feb 2025
Expires: Non-expiring
Max payout: $100,000
Payout quantity: 3
GENERAL INFORMATION
UFarm Asset Management caters to both institutional and private investors. Institutional investors can efficiently manage their digital assets via the platform. Private investors are able to select the most suitable asset manager based on their preferences and an independent scoring system via a web-based application.
Website: https://ufarm.digital
Assets type: Smart Contracts
Chains: Arbitrum
Programming language: Solidity
Product types: DeFi
Project categories: Asset Management
PAYOUTS
Smart Contracts
Critical: $10,000 - $100,000
- Permanent funds freeze
- Protocol Insolvency
- Direct theft of any user funds (at-rest, in-motion)
- Unclaimed yield excluded
High: $1,000 - $10,000
- Unclaimed yield permanent freeze
- Unclaimed yield theft
- Profit oriented block stuffing
Medium: $500 - $1,000
- Unbounded gas consumption
- Gas Theft
- Smart contract incapacitated due to insufficient token funds
- Griefing
Low: up to $100
- A smart contract does not meet the promised returns, yet retains its value
Informational: Not eligible
PROGRAM RULES
- Respect the scope of the program
- Don't discuss or disclose vulnerability information without prior written consent
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
- Current employees, vendors (auditors), partners and contractors are not eligible to participate in the bug bounty program
REWARDS AND RECOGNITION
- Payouts are handled by the team directly and are denominated in USD. However, payouts are done in USDT at the discretion of the team
- The bug bounty program reserves the right to adjust award amounts based on the quality and accuracy of submissions within the specified range
SUBMISSION GUIDELINES
- Reports should be submitted through the Remedy platform
- High/Critical severity bug reports should include a runnable Proof of Concept (PoC) in order to prove impact
ASSETS IN SCOPE
Smart Contracts:
OUT OF SCOPE
- Attacks that the reporter has already exploited themselves, leading to damage
- Attacks requiring access to leaked keys/credentials
- Attacks requiring access to privileged addresses (governance, strategist)
- Incorrect data supplied by third-party oracles (does not exclude oracle manipulation/flash loan attacks)
- Basic economic governance attacks (e.g. 51% attack)
- Lack of liquidity
- Best practice critiques
- Sybil attacks
- Centralization risks
- Impacts requiring basic economic and governance attacks (e.g. 51% attack)
- Impacts from Sybil attacks
- Problems Caused by L1 Gas Pricing
- Freezing of own funds due to mistaken operation
- Impacts from malicious upgrades to third party contracts
- Temporary impacts resulting from configuration adjustment race-conditions