
Kiln (dApp/Infra)
Bounty Range
$1,000 - $100,000
external program


Bounty Range
$1,000 - $100,000
external program
Kiln is a yield product platform you can use to stake or deposit into defi directly, whether you are custodian of your funds or you integrate us in your non-custodial platform.
We enable you or your clients to deposit crypto assets, manually or programmatically, while maintaining custody of your funds in your existing solution, such Fireblocks, Copper, or Ledger.
This program is for Kiln's Web/App and Infrastructure assets. For bug reports for their Smart Contracts, please visit their other programs:
Kiln (dApp/Infra) provides rewards in USDC on Ethereum, denominated in USD.
Websites and Applications
Critical
High
Medium
For critical web/apps bugs, reports will be rewarded to 10% of the impacted TVL, up to a maximum of USD 100,000, only if the impact leads to:
All other impacts that would be classified as Critical would be rewarded a flat amount of USD 8,000. The rest of the severity levels are paid out according to the Impact in Scope table.
Payouts are handled by the Kiln Infrastructure + Web team directly and are denominated in USD. However, payments are done in USDC on Ethereum.
The calculation of the net amount rewarded is based on the average price between CoinMarketCap.com and CoinGecko.com at the time the bug report was submitted. No adjustments are made based on liquidity availability.
Kiln Infrastructure + Web will be requesting KYC information in order to pay for successful bug submissions. The following information will be required:
If the claim comes from an individual:
If the claim comes from a business:
Kiln Infrastructure + Web adheres to the Primacy of Rules, which means that the whole bug bounty program is run strictly under the terms and conditions stated within this page.
Proof of concept is always required for all severities and has to comply with the Immunefi PoC Guidelines and Rules.
Category 3: Approval Required
The project may be receiving reports that are valid (the bug and attack vector are real) and cite assets and impacts that are in scope, but there may be obstacles or barriers to executing the attack in the real world. In other words, there is a question about how feasible the attack really is. Conversely, there may also be mitigation measures that projects can take to prevent the impact of the bug, which are not feasible or would require unconventional action and hence, should not be used as reasons for downgrading a bug's severity.
Immunefi has developed a set of feasibility limitation standards which by default states what security researchers, as well as projects, can or cannot cite when reviewing a bug report.